Archive for the ‘politics’ category

Hockey’s Greatest Hit

April 18, 2008

I admit to being a hockey fan. It’s not a sport that translates to television well, but, in person, it’s some of the greatest fun you can have in a sports arena.

In my opinion, this is hockey’s greatest hit. It took place during the 1995 Stanley Cup Finals, a classic between the Detroit Red Wings and New Jersey Devils. Hope this ends up watcheable, most of my attempts at posting graphics don’t turn out well.

Now, c’mon, wouldn’t you really love to lay that hit on George Bush? Or Barney Frank? Or Ted Kennedy? Or Joe Solmonese?


Good and bad news

April 13, 2008

First, the good:

These folks will make you smile. They’re 70 years old and up, and singing rock n’ roll. The gentleman singing “Fix Me” by Coldplay, with the beat kept by his oxygen machine, was special.

Then, the bad:

> Phyllabuster: HRC goes petty: directs security to
> escort educators  out
>    The Human Rights Campaign (HRC) just got more
> petty  and immature in
> responding to protests of its actions last fall that
> clearly  divided a once
> united GLBT community.
>    As we arrived at the site for the Houston
> protest  of the HRC fundraiser
> this Saturday, April 12th afternoon (reposts below
> for  those new to this
> saga), we were told by hotel security that HRC had
> changed its  mind about our
> attempts to educate.
>    We would be allowed to enter (without signs or
> banners, which we had
> never planned to bring inside).  If we went
> directly to the event located on the
> second floor, we could hand out our lapel  stickers
> that read, “GLBT & ENDA:
> United, Not Divided: I Support FULL  Transgender
> Inclusion.”  And we could
> engage in conversation and educate  those people who
> wanted to listen and learn.
>    So we walked around, outside the hotel for  over
> an hour, carrying signs
> and visiting with each other.  It  was very
> festive.
>    The Houston Police gave us NO trouble.  There
> were two very minor
> incidents where officers got a bit testy,  but when
> I called their OIC, those
> officers were told they were wrong and  to stop
> being testy with us.  The rest of
> the force were very polite to  us.
>    We joked amongst ourselves that we hardly
> warranted  the riot barricades
> or the eight, horse-mounted officers or the  other
> preparations and
> personnel.  But the police felt it was better to be
> prepared than not.
>    The hotel had a guard at each door and along
> several parts of the
> sidewalk.  They had placed traffic cones
> everywhere.
>    It was surreal — all that effort for just
> little  ole, inoffensive us.
>    After we had watched a lot of folks enter for
> the  HRC event and it
> approached the planned 6 PM beginning, three of us
> entered the  hotel, prepared to
> chat and educate for the hour before the 7 PM
> dinner,  using our stack of 3 x
> 2 lapel stickers to initiate conversation.
>    We were met at the top of the escalator by an
> HRC official wearing a
> cream colored business skirt and coat.  I asked if
> this was the HRC event area,
> and she said yes.  So I offered someone a  lapel
> sticker.  I was immediately
> corrected, “No, not here, but here (she  was
> indicating a place 18 inches away
> on the other side of a rope).  Hotel  security was
> poised nearby.
>    So we walked along the rope to an opening and
> around to the other side
> of the rope.  I then offered another lapel  sticker.
>  An HRC man with a pink
> tie, a pink vest and dyed blonde hair  (clearly who
> would be discriminated
> against on the basis of “gender  expression”) said,
> “No, not hear, but here
> (pointing us back to the initial  place that we had
> just left).
>    I pulled out my cell phone.  Immediately,  the
> HRC guy told the hotel
> security to escort us out of the hotel.  An  event
> photographer took a photo as
> the hotel security closed and asked us  to leave.
> There was no hustle.  The
> security was polite.  But we  had to leave at HRC’s
> direction and insistence!
>    So we did our gig outside until 7 PM.  The
> weather was beautiful.
> During this part of our gig when we had planned to
> be inside educating, some
> friends drove up and lowering their window, asked
> how  it was going.  I told them
> about being escorted out at the direction of HRC
> when I began to offer lapel
> stickers.  Our friends took a stack of lapel
> stickers and said, “They won’t
> ask us to leave!”
>    As our group was packed up and leaving, I  got a
> phone call that HRC had
> finally agreed to allow us to come in  now — after
> 7 PM, when all the
> cocktail chatty and education time was  finished and
> folks would be sitting down to
> eat and hear a program.  Or we  could come back at
> 10 PM to offer folks our
> stickers as they left the  event.
>    After being jerked around by HRC for the past
> hour, we were not about to
> submit ourselves to another trick or  lie.  We left
> to refresh and reflect
> at the nearby eatery.
> NOTE: Protests against HRC are being planned for New
> Orleans and  Phoenix.  I
> will send info when I get it.
> Phyllis Randolph Frye
> _www.tglegal.com_ (
> _prfrye@aol.com_ (

So, we can, from Phyllis Frye’s account of the event, glean the following.

1. HRC had arranged for enough security to prevent Osama bin Laden, or the Phred Phelps Cult, from infiltrating their soiree.  Probably far more security, between hotel security, HRC’s security people, and the Houston Police, than would be needed to squelch an IRA attack. Mounted officers? Really, now!

2. The transgender contingent was jerked around on purpose, and with intention of being thrown off the premises, by HRC’s people. It’s either a case of 3 different people with 3 different instructions (in which case, the HRC organizers were disorganized dumbasses, certainly a possibility), or  they meant to jerk the protesters around. Which meant that the person who told  Phyllis that they could “educate” inside was obviously a graduate of the “Joe Solmonese Never Tell Trannies The Truth” course.

3. The good part: there seem to have been no mishaps, no arrests, and nobody needing bail money. I feared for the protesters safety and liberty. These are people I’ve met and respect greatly, and an organization that deliberately can lie to 1000 T people is also possibly capable of other acts of violence against transpeople.

The transgender community needs to make it it’s mission, from here on out, to protest and educate at each and every HRC gala event, in each and every city in the US, with the goal of educating, embarrassing, and protesting HRC’s propensity to deliberately lie and subvert the T community, as well as making their attendees question the wisdom of donating money to an organization that lies like a Persian rug.  A distraction? Possibly, but if HRC isn’t forced to stop their lying about, and subversion of, the T community, we will be prevented from accessing offices in DC, and will be locked out by Barney Frank, at HRC’s behest. It’s a dirty job, but it will have to be done, and we may have to get our hands dirty to do it. It’s engineering. You have to get your hands dirty, sometimes. Kudos to my friends and associates in Houston for showing the fortitude, wisdom, and good common sense that is endemic to Texans.


Reading: Still working on “John Adams”, by David McCullough

On the turntable: Laura Nyro, “Eli & The Thirteenth Confession”

April 12, 2008

Those of you who’ve read my writings before already are quite aware that I consider the Human Rights Campaign (HRC) to be a pack of liars, an anti-democratic corporate entity that is only interested in empire building, not winning rights for glbT people.

I’ve known and called Joe Solmonese a liar before, so many times I’m tired of saying it. If you don’t agree, you’re either ignorant in general, or a total dumbass. But, never before, have I equated him to the rapscallions I’m about to, nor have I ever made the comparisons between HRC and the organizations I’m about to.

Read this post, from the famous Houston transgender attorney, Phyllis Frye. Read it carefully. My comments follow it.

Phyllabuster: National HRC called the Houston Police about Saturday

I just finished a very pleasant meeting, in my law office with the
Houston Police Department about the scheduled protest of the HRC
event in Houston this Saturday from 4:30to 7:30 pm, downtown at Polk
and Avenue of the Americas (DETAILS PASTED BELOW).

It seems that in response to my national Phyllabuster about our
protest, …… GET THIS …… the National HRC called the Houston

HPD and I had a very nicemeeting. I do not foresee any problems. HPD
was so courteous that Iwas given a “Demonstration Guide” that they
published in 2003 to assistcitizens in expressing their 1st Amendment
rights will not violating anylaws. I told HPD that I would scan it
and attach to my list. It isattached herein as good general

During the chat with HPD, I was also
informed that HRC has also instructed the hotel security to ask us
to leave if we attempt to pass out any written information or
ask folks to wear our stickers.

I always thought thatHRC was big on education and discussion.

Well, we will be there (read reposting below).
andwe will be peaceful,
andwe will be within the law,
andwe will be protected by HPD,
andwe will attempt to hand out our lapel stickers.

Phyllis Randolph Frye
http://www.tglegal. com

############ ######## repost of event details ############

Phyllabuster: Protest HRC Event, this Saturday,April 12, Houston

The HRC event is scheduled to begin at 6PM. That means some of the
ultra-rich-donors will arrive early forpre-gala cocktails.

I suggest that we plan to begin at 4:30 PM tocatch those coming early
and stay until 7:30 PM. That should be enough asthe event begins at
6:00 and most folks — even the late comers — willhave passed our
demonstrations by then.

The convention center hotel in downtown Houstonis bounded by Dallas
St, Avenue de las Americas (running in front of the GeorgeR. Brown
Convention Center), Polk St and Crawford St.

The two primary entrances are on DallasSt and on Avenue de las

There is an elevated pedestrian bridge from theGeorge R. Brown and
another from the Parking Garage.

The Parking Garage’s vehicle entrance is at PolkSt and Avenue de las

I suggest that you park in the ParkingGarage or on a nearby street
and meet at that corner of Polk St and Avenuede las Americas.

Either myself or Josephine Tittsworth on herscooter or Vanessa
Edwards-Foster — one or all of us will be at thatorganizing spot —
will ask you what you want to do and direct you to where youwill be
the most effective.

I suggest three outside teams and one insideteam.

The outside teams will be for signs. Isuggest
(1) the corner of Polk and Avenue de las Americas,just off of that
hotel entrance
(2) the corner of Dallas and Avenue de lasAmericas, and
(3) along Dallas near Crawford, just before thedrive in for that
hotel entrance.
Any and everyone driving in will see those threespots.

The inside team will be several of us tomix and mingle and convince
attendees to be supportive of full GLBT inclusionand to wear our
offered lapel stickers (artwork below).

I have pasted two artworks hereon. They are JPEG files that you can
probably right click to lift and copy toyour computer. Most Kinkos
will take a jpeg file and turn it into a nicelarge and readable
poster for a reasonable fee. Or you canmake your own sign. All
efforts are welcome.

BUT DO NOT PUT YOUR SIGN ON A STICK. Astick could be construed as a

I have the first artwork printed onto 1000 lapelstickers. The inside
team can walk amongst the guests at the eventand ask if they will
wear the lapel sticker. I especially hope thatMatthew Shepherd’s
mother (the keynote speaker) will wear a lapel sticker.

The outside teams will also have lapel stickers

So, mark your calendar THIS Saturday, April12.

Make your sign or poster if you wish or goto Kinks and give them the
artwork. I have otherartworks. If you want other artwork files, let
me know.

Come and park and walk to the corner of Polk andAvenue de las
Americas at 4:30’ish and look for me or Josephine orVanessa. Plan to
stay until 7:30’ish. It should be fun!




Phyllis Randolph Frye

Ohh-kaaay. Let’s see here. The Houston HRC dinner’s Saturday night – my calendar says it’s April 12, half the time I don’t know what date it is, anyway.  And Houston area T activists are gonna protest it – damn right, I’m down with that,  I’d join ’em if there were seats on an airplane available from here, which there aren’t.  But the part that gets me is this: THEY SENT THE COPS TO TALK TO PHYLLIS FRYE DAYS BEFORE THE EVENT.

I only take that one way: HRC was trying to use the Houston Police to intimidate an organizer of the protest to call it off.

Would somebody explain to me, please, how this differs from having a firehose pointed at the protesters? (Selma, AL)  Or having National Guardsmen carrying automatic weapons? (Kent State) Perhaps it’s closer to having Arkansas State Troopers present to make sure a couple coed students made it safely to their classrooms past Orval Faubus and hundreds of screaming rednecks – I don’t know. Whose side ARE the Houston cops on?  Are they going to be there to protect the transpeople’s (and everyone’s) right to peacefully protest? Or are they going to be there to protect the poor, downtrodden, rich gay guys from having to deal with the impudent trannies?  I doubt the cops know.

Joe Solmonese goddamn well knows the Number One fear of most transpeople is to be arrested – and with good reason.   They  know what this threat means, the symbolism involved. Threatening transgender protesters means 10 times what it means to a group of straight, or even gay and lesbian people.  Vince Lombardi once said that, if and when a quarterback passes the ball, 3 things can happen, and 2 of them are bad. Basically, nothing good can ever come to a T person once they check into the Steel Bar Inn.

They’re fucking with the wrong persons.  Phyllis, Vanessa, and Jo are made of sterner stuff than most T people I know. They’re also smarter than most, and they’ll know how far they can go to make the point and not be in danger. Still, this is a blatant attempt to break the demonstration, to scare off the demonstrators, to suppress the idea the protesters plan to extol (that ENDA without T inclusion is meaningless and morally bankrupt, a notion I fully believe in).  HRC’s use of the Houston Police Department to attempt to suppress this demonstration is morally the same as the forbidden fruit that was left hanging in the trees by the Ku Klux Klan, or the hangings of the bodies of city officials in the city squares after the Nazi German panzer troops overran towns in the countries they conquered.

So, Joe Solmonese and David Smith, how’s it feel to be Bull Connor?  How’s it feel to suppress dissent in the same manner Nathan Bedford Forrest thought appropriate? Does the possibility of becoming just like Benito Mussolini warm the cockles of your heart the way a fucking nasty-ass Appletini does? Will your ignorant and misguided attempt to stifle dissent among your banquet attendees end up with a one-act play, in which the Houston PD plays the part of the Ohio National Guard, T people are the people killed at Kent State, and you, Mr Solmonese, are the second coming of Richard Milhous Nixon (with David Smith as H.R. Haldeman?)  I hope not. But you’ve put the pieces in place to cause that to happen.

Mr. Solmonese, we’re aware of your attempts to stifle dissent in Atlanta, Phoenix, and other cities. In other places, the protests have gone on, with obvious cuts in attendance and monies raised. The protests will no doubt continue, and will make it impossible to even start a steering committee (only good for steering money towards DC and not from it to benefit local efforts, I will point out) in places you haven’t cursed with one, yet.  But free speech is allowed in this country, despite the best efforts of the GOP to eliminate it with the Patriot Acts. The T community is going to continue to point out to you that you lie, that you cheat, that you steal, and that you are dishonest and unreliable. But now, you’ve handed us one more weapon – open prejudice and open bigotry.

It didn’t look good in the 1960s.

It looks worse now.

Come to think of it, don’t Lester \"Pickrick\" Maddox and Joe Solmonese look a lot alike?


Presently reading: John Adams, by David McCullough

On the turntable: “Who’s To Bless And Who’s To Blame”, by Kris Kristofferson

Ending The New Cold War

January 30, 2008

From Stettin in the Baltic to Trieste in the Adriatic, an iron curtain has descended across the Continent. – Winston Churchill

Ever since September 2007, the T community and a good part of the GL community, most notably the political side of HRC, as well as some of the GL bloggers like Aravosis and Chris Crain, have been in a state of cold war. We do not communicate, and HRC feels they can choose our leaders, pick our representatives for us, listen to those they want and not listen to those who’d tell the truth, no matter how brutal. Joe Solmonese’ Southern Comfort speech, and his effort to characterize the lie he told during it as “misspeaking”, shows the unbelievable corporate contempt HRC has for the T community. As a result of that speech, and HRC’s deceitful lobbying techniques used in the passage of H.R. 3685, nearly all T activists have sworn to never speak or do business with HRC ever again. I’ve advocated that approach, myself. It’s pretty hard to do business with an organization that has such a history, going back to the 1990s, of deceit, conceit, and deception in their business practices, not to mention the fact that their words cannot be believed. As a result, among transgender activists, not to mention many GL activists, an iron curtain has descended between them and HRC.

While we should never give up our principles, we must also realize that we cannot maintain our principles unless we survive. – Henry A. Kissinger

HRC, in its rare town hall meetings, ostensibly held to explain their ENDA strategy and actions of Fall 2007, has taken the position that “Joe misspoke himself” at Southern Comfort. The manner in which they say this points out the difference between people who live “inside the DC Beltway”, and people who don’t live in the seat of government. Joe Solmonese believes he misspoke, most likely. To those of us who are more plainspoken, he told a baldfaced lie. And, nobody wants to do business with, or trust, a liar, do they? Of course not.

In reality, we all do business with liars all the time. Politicians at all levels, not just DC, lie and lie daily. Lawyers are paid to lie, to get their clients off. Shopkeepers lie about their products’ quality, preachers lie, and that’s before we get to the buying and selling of cars and trucks. The question is this: do we want to throw away the T community’s chances at passage of rights laws, in return for moral indignation and high principle, especially when the people we must do business with have the exact same (lack of) moral standards and level of innate dishonesty? I think that we need to consider the need for survival – and passing T-inclusive employment protections into Federal law could well mean survival for many T people.

The superpowers often behave like two heavily armed blind men feeling their way around a room, each believing himself in mortal peril from the other, whom he assumes to have perfect vision. – Henry A. Kissinger

There is no question that transgender leaders rarely share background, history, or culture with many GL leaders. In her TransGriot blog posting entitled ,”Why The Transgender Community Hates HRC,” Monica Roberts wrote In the 90’s the transgender leadership became more national in scope and more diverse by the end of the decade. In addition to the founding core leadership from California and the Northeast corridor, transleaders emerged in Arizona, Colorado, Texas, Louisiana, Florida, Georgia, Tennessee, North Carolina, Kentucky, Ohio, and Illinois. The emergence of leaders from what was derisively called ‘flyover country’ by the peeps from Cali and the Northeast Corridor changed the dynamics of the transgender rights movement.The addition of leaders from these states brought people into the movement who not only believed in the principles of Kingian inclusion and non-violence, they practiced those values. The rise of the Internet gave them efficient communications links to exchange information and tactics, coordinate strategy and inexpensively talk to each other. They were also people of faith who had ringside seats to the Religious Right takeovers of the Republican parties in these regions. The Texans watched their state be used as a laboratory for the tactics that would be used in the South and later the rest of the country.As people of faith who were mostly Southerners, the new transleaders correctly perceived that the Religious Right was the same coalition of 60’s racist anti-progressive forces masquerading in ‘family values’ drag and urged coordinated efforts to defeat them.Unfortunately, while the Religious Right was using the 80’s and 90’s to organize for culture war and develop their Machiavellian playbook to power, transpeople were fighting a pitched battle with the gay and lesbian community just to be included. This civil war against the GLB transphobes sucked time, energy and money from the transgender community that could have been better spent combating the Religious Right.

The predominately white and bicoastal-based gay and lesbian leadership didn’t see the Religious Right as a threat because they not only didn’t have fundies in their backyards, they let their anti-transgender biases color their perceptions. They dismissed the threat because it was transpeople who were sounding the warning bells about it. At the same thime they were cavalierly dismissing their concerns about GLBT unity and the Religious Right threat, they arrogantly demanded that transpeople work to pass gay-only rights bills.”

Most transgender community leaders that I know have little knowledge, in turn, of gay culture. I admit that I don’t.  Drag shows bore me to tears, I prefer Midleton’s Irish whiskey, neat, to martinis, I dress like a slob most of the time, and I can’t dance. Literally, if men are from Mars and women from Venus, then gay men are from Uranus, lesbians are from Saturn, and transpeople from Neptune. A prime example is the popularity of gay entertainer Charles Knipp’s allegedly comic character “Shirley Q. Liquor” among gay audiences; Shirley Q. Liquor is universally abhorred by transpeople as an insulting and racist characterization harkening back to minstrel shows. Likewise, the popularity among lesbians of the writings of Germaine Greer and Janice Raymond, both abhorrent to transgender people, illustrates the cultural distance sometimes present. Transgender people know well the history of what HRC and others like Raymond and Greer have said and done; likewise, many GL people hold on to the belief that T issues are foreign to them, and some even oppose them outright. Clearly, we each believe the other is more of a threat to the other than we are; in reality, both of us are ineptly open, by dint of our lack of knowledge of the other, to attacks from the Religious Right and social conservatives.

The Cold War isn’t thawing; it is burning with a deadly heat. Communism isn’t sleeping; it is, as always, plotting, scheming, working, fighting. – Richard M. Nixon

HRC does not particularly care what we, as a community, think of them. Our hate for them is unrequited, not returned. They will continue to do what they are doing, regardless of whatever we may think of them or write about them. Neither does Barney Frank – Congressman Frank is widely rumored to be assembling a group of white, East Coast, non-critical transgender women to participate in hearings on H.R.3686, the separate gender-only bill that has no chance of being voted upon anytime soon. These hearings, along with HRC’s town hall meetings, are examples of the fact that HRC will follow their agenda, unabated. Transgender people are little more than an inconvenience or annoyance to them. For hatred and anger to bring them to heel, it will take a massive impact on fundraising, a massive dent in their membership rolls, or catastrophic failure in its legislative mission. The T community is limited in its ability to effect such things – it simply lacks the organization, money, and numbers of activists willing to do so.Worse, still, is the threat from the Religious Right. In November 2007, the Jefferson County, KY., school board considered employment protections for GLBT faculty and employees. Even though Louisville/Jefferson County is a jurisdiction that has had a T-inclusive employment/housing/ public accomodations law in place since 1999, then reaffirmed in 2004, the T was quickly jettisoned when push came to shove – and omission from H.R, 3685 was cited as a rationale for that omission.

The Religious Right does not differentiate between gay and trans. Even if employment laws omit transgender people, the “man in a dress using the women’s restroom” analogy is nearly always used as a reason to not pass such legislation, and will continue to be used. Gay and lesbian people, just as often as transgender people, are painted by Christian fundamentalist extremists as being pedophiles, even though the most likely type of person to engage in pedophilia is a straight married male Caucasian.

“Never hold discussions with the monkey when the organ grinder is in the room.” Winston Churchill

I don’t trust HRC, and most transgender activists don’t, either, but eventually transgender activists will have to sit across a table and speak to them. We know they will, probably, lie to us, because they’ve done so many times before, including very recently. Yet, sooner or later, transgender people will have to do business with HRC, if we want to be included in legislation in 2009, or even in the years beyond that. We need, then, as a community, to decide who should do the talking for us, and decide to let them do so without conducting the sort of on-line questioning of motive and integrity that so far has occurred, whether that questioning may have been warranted or not.What do we ask for, in a negotiation? First of all, a public apology for the SCC lie. A return in kind of the monies fundraised from the transgender community at SCC, spread among the major transgender lobbying organizations (IFGE, NTAC, TAVA, and NCTE). A pledge to never again lobby against the interests of the transgender community to expediently pass a GL-only bill. A commitment to hire transgender people to work for HRC in varying capacities, including on the various boards and in the Federal Club – and not just the “nice trannies”, but transgender activists that have actually carried picket signs outside HRC galas and events, transgender people of all ages, gender identities (including intersexed), and transgender people of color.

Unfettered access to Congressional and Senate offices, with HRC-affiliated aides being involved only long enough to get the transgender lobbyists in the office with the actual Members of Congress, must be one of the demands in the negotiations. Many Congressional aides have served internships with, or have worked for, HRC. In fact, part of our problem in Congress last year was due to, I feel, our lobbyists’ongoing inability to meet with actual Congressmen and Senators. We are giving our knowledge and stories to aides, when it it the actual Members who need to hear them. This is a logjam that must be broken through, if this community is to ever be included in employment rights legislation. When Barney Frank said in September 2007 that not enough education had been done, this is what he was talking about – and, yes, you can bet that HRC meant for the education to not take place, or wanted it to come from their lobbyists’ mouths, not the mouths of transgender people, for some reason. Knowing that reason, beyond doubt, should be a priority. However, to break this logjam, we must get past the aides and through to the Members – and HRC will have to be induced to let us do that.

Others, I’m sure, can add to this list of demands – and I encourage comments to that effect.

We also need to decide to whom we should speak – and that needs to be our community’s decision. HRC will, very likely, expect this community to negotiate with people who lack the authority to deliver on matters of question. We must stand firmly on the need to speak with the person who’s set HRC’s political strategies for the past 10 years or so. Hint: that’s not Joe Solmonese. No, that’s David Smith, the long-time power behind the throne, and a man long known to be unenthusiastic about the transgender rights movement. Solmonese, as seen at SCC and the weeks thereafter, can promise much, but if Smith doesn’t agree, it isn’t happening, and they have no compulsion about leaving ol’ Joe twisting in the wind. In short, talking to Solmonese won’t do the job – he’s just the monkey. Smith is the organ grinder.

A Time For Detente

The feelings of the transgender community are still very raw, where HRC is concerned. We must remember that the violation does not get us closer to achieving the passage of legislation. We must accept that HRC IS the 10,000 pound gorilla on the Hill. They know they have a big problem among transgender people, as well as with right-thinking GLBT organizations who support full transgender inclusion, and no amount of hatred or invective vented via the Internet will affect that one bit – although some effective protests, like the October 1997 protest at the national dinner in DC, may. Playing upon their desire to mend fences may help this process. At the same time, we must guard that all segments of the community have a say, that it is not a one-way negotiation, and that all organizations have a say in the questions and terms. In fact, I suspect that this community isn’t going to be able to agree on who to negotiate, let alone what to negotiate, and that Barney Frank and HRC will simply impose their will. I fully expect to be vilified in print, even by people I respect and consider friends, for daring to suggest that we should negotiate with the monolithic Gibraltar on Rhode Island Ave.. I don’t know about anyone else, but I’m not willing to let them have their say, without getting a word in edgewise. The time to start getting that word in edgewise, is now. Otherwise, we’re going to be reduced to writing letters to Congressmen’s office that will never be read by Congressmen, and bitching to each other on the Internet. That simply isn’t good enough for me, and people are quite literally starving and being killed for being transgender.  What harm is there in talking?  Unless hatred is the best we can do………

 Look at ya
Yeah, take a look in the mirror now tell me what you see
Another satisfied customer in the front of the line for the American dream
I remember when we was both out on the boulevard Talkin’ revolution and singin’ the blues
Nowadays it’s letters to the editor and cheatin’ on our taxes
Is the best that we can do
Come on”Amerika, Version 2.0″ – Steve Earle

Present Book: “The Gonzo Way”, by Anita Thompson

On the turntable: “There Goes The Neighborhood”, by Joe Walsh

And the First Annual Ringed Seal Award Goes To…….

January 15, 2008

Joe Solmonese, of course, for being a fucking liar. Misspoke, my ass.

You are polar bear meat, Joe! Congratulations, you scumsucking fuckhead.

“> PB

Fools! All Night Long!

September 25, 2007

I don’t know what (c)rapper came up with the idea of encouraging people to not snitch on those perpetrating crimes, but I have a Top 10 list of good jobs for them – ones with a future, but not precisely the futures they may expect.

10. Toxic waste dump truck unloader.

9. Ringed seal in Churchill, Manitoba.

8. Plutonium plant protective suit and glove cleaner.

7. Rocky Mountain Oyster fisherman

6 . Pig Manure spreader without air tanks.

5. Defensive Coach for the ’07-08 Louisville Cardinals football team.

4. Cleaning crew for meth lab operators.

3. Carcinogenic chemical test subject.

2. Hunting buddy of Dick Cheney.

1. George Bush’s personal cock sucker (Condoleeza Rice’s job)

Seriously, if you see a crime committed against me, you know who did it, and you don’t tell the cops all the details, you’re a piece of shit, and I hope you get cancer and die. Really. I wish that on you. I have zero sympathy for people who commit crimes, and I want them locked away. Permanently. Pitch the key down a sewer.

And for the all-night-long fool who came up with the “no snitching” bullcrap, I’d like to introduce you to the Babe – my 34-oz. Louisville Slugger.


Governor Asshole Fletcher

July 6, 2007

In case you weren’t already aware of it, Kentucky does not have a Governor, it actually has an asshole, known as Ernie Fletcher. This lines up well with the heavily GOP-dominated State Senate.

Fletcher called a special session of the legislature, in order to deal with a shakedown by Peabody Coal Company, and to please his friends in the Religious Reich. The State House responded by adjourning until next January.

That’s the first sensible thing I’ve seen the Kentucky General Assembly do in many years.
The letter from Peabody Energy is on the state’s website. It’s nothing short of a shakedown, not unlike something Don Corleone would have written. The fact that Ernie Fletcher lacks the balls to tell them where to go and how to get there makes him unfit to serve. Worse, Fletcher included a redux of his proposed ban on domestic partner benefits in the agenda for the Special Session, and obviously he and his Religious Reich lackey friends are going to not get what they want now. Boo-hoo, Ernie.

It costs in the high 5 figures every day the Special Session is working, and the fact that Fletcher would waste hundreds of thousands of dollars of state money, in an effort to sell out to a corporate shakedown AND the Religious Reich AT THE SAME TIME, makes him even more truly unfit to govern than his previous acts have shown him to be. If the voters of Kentucky don’t defeat him by a massive margin, there is no hope for Kentucky, period.

Oh, yeah: did I tell you to go to hell, Fletcher? I just did.


Let’s Ram A House

July 6, 2007

First of all, check this link:

And you’ll find the story of Kerrick Jenkins, a shithead who likes to drink and drive, and ram houses with his SUV.

I know where this house is. You have to be trying to hit it with an SUV – this was no accident. If Jenkins didn’t do this deliberately, he must have been absolutely blind-drunk – and given his history, he probably was. There’s no reason for anyone who doesn’t live in that neighborhood to even be on that street – it is not a thoroughfare, it is a neighborhood street.

Thank God there were no injuries. The house suffered extensive damage. I suspect that Jenkins has no insurance – there’s no insurance company alive that should even consider giving a scumsucker like that car insurance. If he does not, he should be doing the rebuilding job himself on these people’s house, while in leg irons. After which, a few years in the slammer would be in order.

I greatly admire the dignity of the people wronged, on camera. Frankly, had Jenkins hit my house, the injuries of the accident would have been only the start or the beating he’d have taken.


Not Good Enough

June 18, 2007

Any polar bear can tell you that claws are necessary. If a bear has no claws, said bear has no weaponry. Yes, the large size of the paws and the roar are, indeed, intimidating. But there have to be claws, because if the bear cannot exact its penalty upon the attacker, it will be threatened again.

So it is with hate crimes.

HR1492 has already passed the House, and is pending in the Senate. George Bush has already announced he’ll veto it, which is exactly what you’d expect of the Asshole In Chief. It should pass, and one hopes the Presidential veto might be overridden.

But it’s not good enough. Not by a long shot.

Cazares, the most culpable of Gwen Araujo’s murderers (not manslaughterers, I saud murderers, in cold blood), got 7 years in jail. He didn’t get life without parole. He didn’t get death by lethal injection.

7 years. Possibly less with parole.

For a young human life.

Where were the claws?

There’s a case, recently cracked, in Arizona. You guessed it. Transperson dead, found in a creekbed, multiple stabbings. 2 years later, they find the perpetrator. Grand jury indicts him. For manslaughter.

Not murder.


Probably 3-5 years in jail if convicted.

Where are the claws?

There’s a kid named Tim. Got killed in the inner city of Louisville. Was found wearing women’s clothing. Transgendered, liked hanging at the clubs. Wasn’t doing anything wrong. The cops claim to not have a lead. Mother says she knows who it was and has evidence.

Somebody’s getting away with murder.

Where are the claws?

In the shopping center across from my home, a shooting happened a couple weeks ago. A retired Jeffersontown cop named Koenig shot a young person.

For cutting him off in a parking lot.

Koenig’s had a reputation for years. He was well known when I was young and hanging around with friends in Jeffersontown. The cop you didn’t want to mess with. It was said he’d beat the shit out of people, that he and his friends would gang swarm you and beat you if you gave them any lip at all, and that he was racist and homophobic. Never happened to me, I always made a point of not putting myself in such a position.
Now he’s retired. He put 6 rounds in a young person’s body, for cutting him off in a mostly empty suburban parking lot. It’s good to see he hasn’t changed a bit. One round lodged in the kid’s brain. He is going to be a vegetable. I doubt Koenig cares. But the kid’s parents care. They filed for a warrant on Koenig. He needs to spend the rest of his life in jail.


They are needed.

The hate crimes law is nice, I strongly favor its passing, and hate George Bush for being duplicitous and stupid enough to wish to veto it. But it doesn’t go far enough for my taste. I feel that any deliberate hate-motivated killing under a hate crimes law should be defined automatically as capital murder, and that the automatic penalty upon conviction be death, or life without parole. I feel that is needed to send the message that killing people for who they are, regardless of that being race, GLBT, religion, or national origin, is totally unacceptable.

I also feel that murderers like Cazares and Koenig are rabid dogs that must, for the good of society, be put down. We can’t cure the disease they have, so let’s put them down.

That requires claws.

And something else that politicians lack these days.



I Propose…..

June 14, 2007

Regarding the national debate on gay marriage, I have a modest proposal.

Americans, particularly fundamentalists, have confused the religious sacrament of marriage, with the legal standings bestowed by marriage, and have done this on purpose as a means of depriving GLBT people of the legal benefits. GLBT activists have played into this by demanding passage of gay marriage laws, which caused a massive legal backlash that effectively has closed the door on GLBT rights laws in many conservative states.

So I propose the following:

Replace the legal term “marriage’, by state or Federal Constitutional amendment, with “civil union.”

Remember what I said about confusion? We confuse, as a government and society, the legal obligations, duties, and standing of marriage, with the moral and religious sacrament of marriage. It should be two separate things entirely, 2 separate terms to describe. The license you get from your county clerk should be known as a civil union, and should be considered contractually binding at the point when it is signed by both parties to the union, and a judge or licensed clergyman. Then , how or whether you are married or not will depend on what you do in church – the religious sacrament.

Reserving the term of ‘marriage’ to the status of a religious sacrament should defuse the arguments over gay marriage. Some denominations and religions will marry them, others won’t – that’s up to the individual church, which is a private club and can, legally, let in or not let in whomever they wish. However, government should have no such option: any 2 consenting adult should be able to enter into the contract known as a civil union, bestowing all legal rights and responsibilities.

There’s no valid argument against granting a legal standing to same-sex couples. The argument that “it would devalue existing marriages” is bullshit on its face. Only the couple themselves can devalue their marriage, by violating it, and that happens daily. But passage of this measure would take the loaded word “marriage” out of the equation, and allow gay couples to gain the legal rights they need in their relationships, and return the word “marriage” to the solemn religious sacramental meaning it should have, and allow individual churches to decide on the question of allowing gay marriage or not.

Of course, it has no chance. Gay couples want to go before a judge and be MARRIED, for some reason the term ‘civil union’ doesn’t mean what it should. Fundamentalists don’t want gay couples to exist, and definitely don’t want the term “marriage” to apply. It’s pure bigotry, but that’s nothing new for fundamentalists – they’re assholes by definition on most subjects. But my proposal is the right one for America at this time – it would render the various DOMA laws meaningless (at least, until they can be repealed), and would grant the rights many need.

And, if the Religious Reich would just go to hell, where they belong and are already headed, that would be so much better.

By the way, I’m in a traditional straight marriage, so check the accusation that this is what I want. But only my wife and I can devalue our marriage, by our own behavior, and not anyone else.

Oh, yes, and did I say that the RELIGIOUS RIGHT SHOULD GO TO HELL! There, I said it.